2011년 8월 1일 월요일

As U.S. debt farce continues, the job picture adds to worries


As U.S. debt farce continues, the job picture adds to worries

OTTAWA— From Monday's Globe and Mail
Considering how vital, and elusive, confidence can be, it has been remarkable to watch so many American politicians behave as if faith in the U.S. economy can be taken for granted
Whatever your views are on the debt ceiling drama that has played out on the Potomac, it’s hard to see how the consumers and businesses that were already questioning whether the world’s biggest economy was on the right track could be feeling any better these days.
Their fragile psychology could take another blow on Friday, when the U.S. Labour Department reports employment data for July. Even with a political agreement that averts a default and satisfies credit-rating agencies, it’s entirely possible that a disappointing jobs report for a third consecutive month would wipe out any upturn in sentiment.
Analysts estimate that U.S. employers added about 90,000 workers during the month – more than twice the total gain in the previous two months combined and enough to hold the jobless rate at 9.2 per cent, but well short of what would be needed to push the rate lower.
That means it is unlikely that consumer spending, which accounts for about 70 per cent of the U.S. economy, will take off soon. Millions are still out of work, half of the unemployed have been without jobs for more than six months, and those with jobs are trying to trim their debt and are hesitant to spend. Much like in 2009, when the U.S. was struggling to get out of the Great Recession, this is fuelling a vicious circle: Consumers won’t spend, so companies are too nervous to hire even though many are flush with cash; because companies aren’t hiring, consumers have less money and confidence to spend, and so on.
The fear and loathing in Washington – mostly loathing – is exacerbating matters.
“We’re still of the view we’re going to probably get a [credit] downgrade as opposed to the sort of Armageddon of a default, but even in that case, all these headlines can’t help but hurt confidence,” Peter Buchanan, an economist with CIBC World Markets, said in an interview last week.
Still, Mr. Buchanan is among the more optimistic, anticipating 125,000 new U.S. jobs for the month, in part because of a lighter-than-normal retooling schedule for some of the biggest auto manufacturers and, consequently, fewer layoffs in that sector.
On the other side of the spectrum, Benjamin Reitzes of BMO Nesbitt Burns said that even as temporary headaches ease, like the impact of the Japanese earthquake on North American supply chains and high gasoline prices, the steady stream of discouraging news from Washington – and, for that matter, Europe – has weakened the business case for aggressive hiring. Mr. Reitzes is looking for just 60,000 net new U.S. jobs.
“It’s certainly a possibility, and I think a strong one, that businesses were just very reluctant to hire over the past few weeks out of uncertainty about what’s going to happen with the debt ceiling, and the European situation before that,” Mr. Reitzes said. “People likely weren’t as willing to hire as they otherwise would have been.”
Given that U.S. growth in the second quarter came in at a meagre annual rate of 1.3 per cent – in no small part because consumer purchasing isn’t growing at all – it’s easy to see why President Barack Obama and Federal Reserve Board chairman Ben Bernanke have warned that the slightest bit of added uncertainty could spell disaster. (Indeed, for Mr. Obama, disaster could strike twice: First, with a slip back toward another recession that the current slash-and-burn climate in Washington won’t let him counter with fresh stimulus spending, and second, next fall when he runs on his economic record.)
With years of federal cuts looming, hiring in the United States will depend on the private sector gaining confidence in the recovery – and being persuaded that politicians understand they cannot throw up unnecessary obstacles in its path.
Canada, which also reports July employment numbers on Friday, has had a smoother turnaround than its southern neighbour. The labour market has recouped all of the jobs lost in the recession, and there are indications that the quality of new work is improving. In June, the economy produced more than 28,000 jobs, and the average for the first six months of 2011 was 32,000, not spectacular but decent for a country of Canada’s size.
As an exporting nation, though, Canada can only grow so much when its main trading partners are in the grip of uncertainty and anxiety. Economists estimate that there were 15,000 workers added in July, and the jobless rate stayed at 7.4 per cent. That’s the lowest unemployment rate in 2½ years, but still higher than pre-recession levels, and it is unlikely to shrink significantly in the coming months.
The Bank of Canada’s summer survey of businesses across the country found most plan to add staff in the second half of 2011. But it was conducted before the U.S. and European crises worsened, and long before last Friday’s U.S. growth figures suggested the soft patch in our principal export market will last longer than initially thought.
And if the farce in Washington keeps pushing the U.S. dollar down, the lofty Canadian currency – arguably the No. 1 threat to the prospects of any Canadian business that sells to the U.S. – could break its modern record of $1.10 (U.S.).
“A lot of companies will be putting [hiring] decisions off until we get a clearer view of what lies ahead,” said Jay Myers, president and CEO of Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters, citing a “cost squeeze” from the higher currency and a recent decline in orders from the United States. “Companies under the gun in terms of cash flow are not going to be out hiring a lot of new people. So it’s going to slow the process down, and let’s hope it’s just on a temporary basis.’’

Following in Europe’s mistaken footsteps


Following in Europe’s mistaken footsteps

From Monday's Globe and Mail

As American politicians of all stripes were doing their best to produce more fodder for the late-night TV comics last week, the markets appeared to be coming to terms with Washington’s peculiar brand of lunacy.
U.S. Treasuries staged a rally on Friday, sending the yield on the benchmark 10-year bond to its lowest level in eight months. Yes, even with all the squabbling between Republicans and Democrats – not to mention the bickering among Republicans themselves – over raising the legislated U.S. debt ceiling, credit for Uncle Sam is still cheap, thanks to fresh worries about the struggling U.S. economy.
Stocks had a miserable week, but this also had as much to do with the latest batch of dismal economic news as the fears the politicians wouldn’t set aside their narrow self-interests long enough to boost the $14.3-trillion (U.S.) debt cap. Yields went up on short-term U.S. notes maturing this month, but that direction will be reversed quickly once their safety is assured.
“The markets are having a hard time discounting the possibility that politicians truly are insane,” Bruce McCain, chief investment strategist with KeyCorp’s private banking arm, memorably told Bloomberg.
So let’s look past this temporary bout of political weirdness to what lies ahead. What our perpetually cloudy crystal ball shows is a hopelessly gridlocked Washington that seems likely to muddle along, following the European pattern of kicking the debt can down the road as long as possible. The inevitable reckoning that debtors normally face after living beyond their means for years is not coming any time soon, no matter how much the Tea Party types kick and scream.
A few weeks ago, “we would have universally said they’re going to get a deal done that’s going to cut expenses and it’s going to be good for financial markets,” says David Ader, who oversees government bond strategy at CRT Capital Group in Stamford, Conn., when he isn’t helping us interpret the tea leaves. “The worst-case scenario, short of a default, would have been this sort of postponement [in tackling the deficit]. Which looks like it’s going to have to be the outcome. It is just going to stretch out the uncertainty and the rancour, like they did in Europe.”
The bond market has already been positioning itself for just such an outcome, as illustrated by low trading volumes and a preponderance of neutral positions. “People don’t have a lot of exposure. They don’t have risk on, “ Mr. Ader says. “The lack of activity – a willingness to put on a risk position – is being mistaken for a degree of optimism about the outcome.” What it really signifies is that institutional investors don’t know what to do.
Meanwhile, though, U.S. Treasuries and other U.S. dollar-based assets remain the safe harbour of choice for global funds that already have more than enough gold, Swiss francs and Japanese yen in their vaults. Especially with the global economy stumbling.
True, the U.S. dollar weakened late last week. But it has fared remarkably well, considering the political crisis in Washington, the warnings of a possible U.S. downgrade from the rating agencies and the economic setbacks. “In the face of Europe’s Greek [debt] plan, you would have thought there would be a euro rally and we would have gotten nailed,” Mr, Ader says. “But no market, globally, is responding in a big way. We ask ourselves: ‘Where are the bond vigilantes?’ You’d think that they would come into play.”
When all is said and done, investors will not be abandoning U.S. debt or dollars any time soon, even if rating agencies make good on their threats to strip the U.S. of its coveted Triple-A rating, in the absence of a credible plan to rein in spending and cut the soaring deficit.
“We all know that we [the U.S.] can cut expenses. We can raise taxes. It’s not an existential thing like what is going on in Europe,” Mr. Ader says. “The market fully recognizes it. It can get upset with Congress. But at the end of the day, it’s not a question of whether you’ll get your money.”
Mr. Ader likens the vastly different situations facing Europe’s peripheral basket-cases and the U.S. to two groups of diners at a pricey restaurant. The Greeks and other poor euro zone relations don’t have enough money for the tab, but proceed to order the most expensive entrees anyway. The Americans can afford anything on the menu, but they haggle over the size of the tip and overstay their welcome.
And what happens once they push themselves away from the trough – er, table?
Regardless of what the politicians or the rating agencies decide, “our thesis remains the same,” says Eric Hickman, managing director with Denver-based Kessler Investment Advisors, which advises international clients on their Treasury strategies. “We’re coming into a period where there is greater austerity throughout the world. China appears to be slowing down. We certainly seem to be slowing down. And without new stimulus, we’re going to see a steady [economic] erosion.” That is bad news for the millions of Americans looking for a job, but good for those holding fistfuls of U.S. government debt.

Spending cuts may salvage U.S. credit rating


Spending cuts may salvage U.S. credit rating

From Monday's Globe and Mail

American politicians appear to have avoided a self-imposed debt default, and likely have done enough to forestall an embarrassing ejection from the ranks of the world’s most trustworthy borrowers.
But the longer-term damage done by the brinksmanship in Washington will only become clear once the current political turmoil eases and global investors readjust their compasses.
The compromise that took root on Sunday would slash spending to reduce the U.S. deficit by almost $3-trillion over the next decade, while restoring the government’s borrowing authority before the Treasury Department starts to run short of cash this week. The size of the cuts may be enough to head off what last week seemed almost inevitable – a historic downgrade of the U.S. government’s triple-A credit rating. A downgrade has the potential to cause upheaval in the world’s financial markets.
“It would be overoptimistic to say this is a big step forward, but it is a big enough initial step to satisfy the credit rating agencies,” said Phillip Swagel, an economics professor at the University of Maryland who was chief economist at the Treasury Department during the financial crisis. “This is a down payment on future reform.”
Though the agreement was being finalized Sunday evening, Prof. Swagel said he was confident the consensus would hold. The proposal had the backing of the leaders of both parties in the Senate. The final hurdle will be a House of Representatives vote.
The austerity measures were the key demand of the Republican-controlled House for agreeing to support the lifting of the $14.3-trillion (U.S.) debt ceiling before a Tuesday deadline – the moment the Treasury says it will run out of accounting tricks to keep the bills paid. Failure to pay bondholders would constitute the first default in U.S. history.
pending cuts will do little concrete to help an economy that is struggling to maintain momentum two years after a recession that, according to new data, was significantly deeper than previously thought.
State and local governments, scrambling to live up to balanced-budget laws amid weaker revenue as a result of the economic downturn, have been a drag on economic growth for three consecutive quarters, and now the federal government appears set to join them. There are no measures in Washington’s compromise that would jolt demand, offsetting corporate American’s reluctance to spend growing profits.
However, the prospect of Washington getting a handle on a budget shortfall that is more than 9 per cent of GDP could leave some executives feeling better about the investing in the United States. That dividend, if it comes, is weeks or months away.
Also, the dollar-value attached to the agreement appears large enough to get the credit rating agencies off the U.S. government’s back. Earlier this month, both Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service said they were considering stripping the U.S. of its gilded standing because of doubts over politicians’ willingness to address rising debt levels.
On Friday, Moody’s said in a report that the U.S. likely would maintain its triple-A credit rating, despite what analyst Stephen Hess characterized as the “limited magnitude” of competing Democratic and Republican deficit-reduction proposals. However, Moody’s concluded that the Treasury would ensure that bondholders are paid no matter what happens on Capitol Hill, and that faster economic growth next year will lessen the strain that the debt burden currently is exerting on the economy.
Also last week, Standard & Poor’s president Devan Sharma told a House committee that his agency’s report on the U.S. was being “misquoted,” dismissing the widely-held notion that S&P would issue a downgrade if politicians failed to shrink the budget shortfall by anything less than $4-trillion. S&P believes a $4-trillion program would stabilize the growth of the U.S.’s debt-to-GDP ratio, but that doesn’t mean that is what is required to maintain a triple-A rating, Mr. Sharma said.
The prospect of an end to the months-long dispute could ease the minds of investors, at least over the short term. Stocks in the U.S. tumbled last week even though many of the country’s biggest publicly traded companies have reported strong earnings over the past couple of weeks. The U.S. dollar was weaker against its peers.
But there is disquiet in financial markets that Washington’s protracted squabble over a legislative measure that was once dealt with as a matter of routine has done significant damage to the country’s reputation as the world’s leading economy.
“The compromise is not enough to offset the considerable economic damage already inflicted by the debt debacle, let alone restore confidence that the political system is able to respond to the serious structural challenges undermining growth and jobs,” Mohamed El-Erian, chief executive officer of Pacific Management Investment Co., said in a commentary Sunday.

In search of a debt-downgrade silver lining


MARKET LAB

In search of a debt-downgrade silver lining

DAVID PARKINSON | Columnist profile | E-mail
From Saturday's Globe and Mail
There has been considerable fretting over the past couple of weeks about the consequences of a U.S. downgrade by the major credit-rating agencies – something that may still happen regardless of the outcome of Washington’s debt-ceiling impasse. The only consensus emerging from the vacillating, uneven markets is one of uncertainty: No one really knows what to expect.
Well, that’s not quite true. Another of the world’s leading government bond issuers, Japan, saw its sovereign debt downgraded in 1998. And its precedent suggests that maybe – just maybe – the United States could weather a downgrade with little damage.
Japan’s experience
Barry Knapp, head of U.S. portfolio strategy at Barclays Capital in New York, noted in a report this week that in general, Japanese assets did not tumble as a result of the rating downgrade in November, 1998.
While Japanese bond prices did fall in the wake of the downgrade, pushing bond yields sharply higher, he noted that the move coincided with a sharp upturn in Japan’s industrial production that led the country out of recession by early 1999. Meanwhile, the yen and the Japanese stock market both rallied after the downgrade.
Mr. Knapp concluded from the Japanese data that “macroeconomic fundamentals were the major drivers of asset prices, rather than the ratings downgrade.” He said Japanese markets were more focused on the domestic economy and the country’s efforts to recapitalize its banks than on the sovereign debt ratings.


Look to the economy
Of course, Japan in 1998 was not what the U.S. is today – the overwhelmingly dominant reserve currency and go-to sovereign lender to the world. It’s hard to predict whether the global markets would shrug off a U.S. downgrade as easily as they did Japan’s.
The Japanese downgrade came at a time of considerably stronger global economic growth than we have now, and it didn’t face the current quagmire of developed-world sovereign debt issues. On the other hand, the Japanese downgrade did come during a banking crisis – the Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) collapse. “The resultant disorderly swings in capital markets make using the Japanese downgrade as a guide to potential market reactions to a possible downgrade of the U.S. sovereign debt rating rather precarious,” Mr. Knapp said.
Still, he believes that macroeconomic factors were the overriding market drivers in Japan – and that would be the case in a U.S. downgrade, too. “We expect that after a brief muted market reaction, the direction of the markets will be highly leveraged to the [economic] data, with expectations of a [2011 second-half] rebound in economic activity hanging in the balance.”

Government Debt Around the Globe (Globe and Mail)

Consequences of U.S. debt crisis could be far-reaching


U.S. DEBT

Consequences of U.S. debt crisis could be far-reaching

From Friday's Globe and Mail



Whatever happens in terms of spending cuts or ceiling levels, the United States’s monstrous $14-trillion debt could have far-reaching, largely negative ramifications for everyone from the decision-makers trying to tame it to homeowners and investors to (gulp) Canadians. As the tortuous toing and froing continues south of the border, Grant Robertson and Tim Kiladzeexamine the potential effects of America’s epic shortfall and the uncertainty around it on some of the key players.



BARACK OBAMA

In a lose-lose situation, whatever deal is struck
Public opinion of President Obama hinges on which specific deal is, or is not, struck. That’s in part because he has already acquiesced on the tax increases he originally argued so fervently for, and now backs Senator Harry Reid’s plan that does not stipulate higher taxes for the wealthy. He must fight hard to salvage the liberal ideas left in the competing bills to appease his party’s base.
Of the two main options on the table, he will be hurt most by the Republican deal, because it would force the debt ceiling to be reraised right before the 2012 election. The symbolic gesture of tacking on more debt won’t sit well with voters, and it will appear as though Mr. Obama has not stabilized the economy 3.5 years into his tenure.
The main Democratic option isn’t much better, but at least it would push the next debt-ceiling debate out past the 2012 election. Conversely, if Congress itself can’t reach a deal, few people will lay the blame squarely on Mr. Obama. He has made it clear for months that he wanted to get a deal done, and the media has portrayed the partisan bickering as a fight within Congress that is happening away from the White House. Still, as much as President Obama tries to distance himself from the political posturing, not reaching a deal would be disastrous for the country as a whole, if only for optics, and at the end of the day the buck stops with the man in charge.
Republicans
Could suffer a torrent of pre-election blame
The debate over raising the U.S. debt ceiling is as much a political crisis as it is an impasse over fiscal prudence. The Democrats want nothing more than to implement the plan put forward by Democratic Senate Majority leader Harry Reid. Though it would cut $2.7-trillion from the U.S. deficit over the next decade, it would lift the debt ceiling through 2013 and effectively put off the next big flashpoint debate over this issue until after the 2012 election.
The Republicans want that fight in the middle of next year’s presidential campaign to show that they are tough on debt. The two-step plan put forward by Republican House Speaker John Boehner proposes to cut spending by $1-trillion over the next 10 years and raise the debt ceiling. But Mr. Boehner’s plan would require a second vote on the debt limit in 2012, at which time another $2-trillion worth of spending cuts would be placed on the table as the two parties were making a run for the White House.
However, if no deal is reached, the Republicans are at a greater risk of political blowback. Even though the party has used the debt-ceiling fight to undermine Mr. Obama’s fiscal policy, the Republicans could be viewed as obstructionist. That’s residue the Republicans don’t want attached to them as they head into an election determined to cast Mr. Obama as the problem.

U.S. BUSINESSES

Staring down ongoing hiring freezes, limited borrowing power
At this point, any deal would bring about a sigh of relief from corporate America. Executives are getting so worried as the deadline grows near that the heads of the country’s biggest banks sent Congress a jointly signed letter on Thursday that stressed the importance of reaching a compromise.
Business leaders have been on edge since the financial crisis first broke because they continue to fear a second recession, and the last thing they need now is more anxiety. Yet reaching a debt deal won’t give them more confidence. Both big and small businesses have been expecting a deal to go through because the debt ceiling has been raised for decades. Having the government agree to it again is simply viewed as the normal course of business. On the other hand, no deal could destroy any lingering morale.
U.S. business owners have already cut back on hiring, which has sent the U.S. unemployment rate ticking higher, and more turmoil will only extend the period during which they refrain from adding new employees. Some of the biggest firms also fear disarray in debt markets. These companies rely on borrowing short-term cash from investors to fund their day-to-day operations. The last time this market froze, the government had to step in and lend to them. Only, this time, that couldn’t happen because the government won’t be able to pay its own bills.

CANADIAN CONSUMERS

Laden with their own debt, facing volatility
The American economy is heavily reliant on consumer spending, and consumers don’t spend when they lack confidence. So while the bond specialists and sovereign-debt analysts worry about Treasury bonds moving half of a per cent higher, what the debt-ceiling crisis boils down to for the average American is passing something that doesn’t rock the boat on household finances.
Should lawmakers succeed in getting a deal in place, consumers are likely to carry on as they were. If the opposite happens, already strained weekly budgets could be tightened even more out of fear that the economy could tank. There are also deeper concerns that consumers may not fully comprehend.
Without a deal, there is a chance borrowing costs will rise, which means mortgage rates could jump higher and lines of credit bear a higher rate of interest. Try convincing an already rattled American to take out a loan that now costs them more money. And those higher costs won’t stop at the border. Canadian banks, too, could be forced to hike rates. Just how much higher is still unknown. But at a time when Canadian household debt has reached record levels in the past year, low consumer confidence and higher interest rates are a volatile mix.

INVESTORS

Susceptible to a ‘reverse stimulus’ effect
Investors are growing more nervous with each passing day, and that has sent American stocks on a five-day slide. This trend is bound to reverse course once news of a deal breaks, but the joy could be temporary. Any bill, regardless of which party puts it forward, will contain spending cuts that function like a reverse stimulus package.
Take Medicare. Forcing seniors to pay more out of their own pockets for health care will hurt their discretionary income, and that is bound to hit corporate bottom lines. As for the macro economy, even if a deal is reached, the U.S.’s massive amounts of debt will still be in the spotlight because Congress must comb through the budget to find what should and shouldn’t be cut. Reminders of that burden will do little to comfort foreign investors.
Should the debt-ceiling deadline come and go with no deal, market volatility will be front and centre. During the worst of the financial crisis, equity and debt markets suffered from wild swings as investors hung on every little piece of news. This time around, fixed-income investors could bear the brunt of the pain because a U.S. debt downgrade will force some money managers to dump their Treasury bonds. (Some of the biggest money management firms and pension funds are mandated to hold only triple-A securities, the safest form of debt.)
Much like an earthquake in the middle of the ocean, anything that happens to Treasury bonds will ripple through the markets.

MARK CARNEY

Struggling against the dangers of an overheated dollar
The Bank of Canada governor faces a conundrum created by a soaring Canadian dollar. The loonie now sits above $1.05 (U.S.) and keeps getting driven higher by the ever-weakening U.S. dollar. It’s a similar story around the world as investors flock to safe-haven currencies, such as the Swiss franc, which is now at record levels against the greenback. If the U.S. reaches a deal to stave off a default, and the greenback stabilizes, Mr. Carney can go back to managing the Canadian economy as he has been, trying to keep interest rates low enough to ensure economic growth continues heading in the right direction.
If the U.S. talks are derailed, and the greenback plunges further, Mr. Carney will have to take steps to keep the Canadian dollar from overheating. The soaring Canadian dollar, though good for vacationers stepping across the U.S. border this summer, threatens to wreak havoc for Canada’s exporters because American firms will have to cough up more U.S. dollars to buy the same amount of Canadian goods. This has a potential impact on jobs and salaries at home. A hot dollar is one thing for Mr. Carney. An overheated dollar is an entirely different concern.